|An even bigger game changer than the|
According to Ruffled Sheets, the Oxballs Atomic Jock Cock-Lock does what it says it does. It's a stretch-to-fit lock-free male chastity device. It's comfortable. You can even pee in it.
However, you can't get erect in it.
I think that this will be an even bigger game changer than the CB2000.
The good old CB2000 and the range it spawned took male chastity out of fetish and turned them into a couple toy. Read their web copy; It's all about the battle of the sexes, or being together, or putting the spark back. And, it's usually a CB-x that makes it into the mainstream media.
|...there are still BDSM overtones |
to the functionality
Also, hard plastic, locks... all seems a bit harsh. If it doesn't fit the BDSM aesthetic, there are still BDSM overtones to the design.
Enter the Cock-Lock.
It's soft, sensual. It sits well next to the dildo and the vibrator. There's no lock, no power exchange... just no erect penis.
It's a mainstream sex toy.
And it's cheap.
Taken together, this makes the device a game changer. Here's why: 75% of all women can't reach orgasm by penetration alone. It follows that, if a woman is at all ambivalent about penis-in-vagina sex, then there's not much motivation for her to do it.
And, young women as a group are notoriously ambivalent about the whole penetration thing.
The [UK] survey's findings show that one in five young men and almost half of young women between the ages of 16 and 24 surveyed wished they had waited longer to start having sex. (source)You'd think improved sex education would encourage people to have sex. However Dutch teenagers have sex later than their counterparts.
|Somebody's briefs -- or jeans! -- stay on, either his or hers|
Back in the day, I had girlfriends who kept their knickers on, or only allowed me to strip to my boxers.
I also remember a girl who made her boyfriend wear Speedos in bed.
Judging from what young men post to forums, I don't think things have changed much. The questions young men post online seem to back this up. Somebody's briefs -- or jeans! -- stay on, either his or hers, usually hers these days by the look of it (though I bet the boys who manage to strip their girls complain less online).
Now enter the Cock-Lock. It even looks like a condom. Sooner or later it's going to escape into the wild:
|And all because of a cheap bit |
"Wear this so I feel safe/to show me you're serious about respecting me."The nice thing about this approach is that, unlike Red Pill tricks, it's honest and trust-building, just an extension of, "If I keep on my jeans will you take off yours?"
"You want to get her jeans off, bro? Get a cock lock."
Even if it doesn't go viral on its own, all it takes is one teen sex comedy. Suddenly bedroom chastity is mainstream.
Now, imagine a world where a lot of young people have their first erotic experiences using a male chastity device.
Some 47% of women fantasize about dominating their partner. Though the Cock-Lock looks innocent, or at least merely naughty, it still puts the aroused male in a weak position, reducing him to a cum-dripping weakling before the erotic awesomeness of his goddess-like girlfriend. To me this looks like an easy, early way into Femdom, turning potential dominatrices into the fully fledged own-pleasure-seeking empowered real thing.
And all because of a cheap bit of thermoplastic.
EDIT: And now there's another soft cage: https://www.extremerestraints.com/chastity-devices_26/detained-soft-body-chastity-cage_9828.html
Don't resign yourself to just getting off on other people's adventures! When we started out, my wife was vanilla. Use my manuals to help you walk the same Femdom path! There's one for him, and one for her.